Thursday, October 25, 2007

So That Explains It......

I'm not sure if this changes my opinion of the finale. I did like the mystery that surrounded it, but I liked it just as much when I watched it the first time and thought Tony lived.

NEW YORK — Just when we had made our peace with "The Sopranos" finale and moved on with our lives, David Chase has stirred things up again.

Breaking his silence months after the HBO mob drama ended its run, he is offering a belated explanation for that blackout at the restaurant. He strongly suggests that, no, Tony Soprano didn't get whacked moments later as he munched onion rings with his family at Holsten's. And mostly Chase wonders why so many viewers got so worked up over the series' non-finish.

"There WAS a war going on that week, and attempted terror attacks in London," says Chase. "But these people were talking about onion rings."

The interview, included in "`The Sopranos': The Complete Book," published this week, finds Chase exasperated by viewers who were upset that Tony didn't meet explicit doom.

Top News
Top Posts
Politics: Bob Kerrey: Why I'm Not Running Again for the US Senate
Media: Catherine Capellaro: My Visit to Planet Fox ("Why Do They Love Wal-Mart So Much?")
Living Now: Verena von Pfetten: Eckhart Tolle And My (Almost) Spiritual Transformation
Business: Dan Solin: Smart Advice for the HuffPost Investor
Entertainment: Lesley M. M. Blume: 15 Going On 50: How Gossip Girl is Killing Youth Culture
Media: Apple Fights To Retain TV Network Deals
Politics: NOT SO FAST
Living Now: California Fires Bring Serious Health Hazards
Entertainment: Video: Tyra Turns Handmade Afghan "Hot And Fierce" In "Tyra's 'It's All About Me' Moment Of The Day"
Business: Subprime Mortgage Meltdown Expected To Be Costlier Than S&L Crisis Of 1990s

Chase says the New Jersey mob boss "had been people's alter ego. They had gleefully watched him rob, kill, pillage, lie and cheat. They had cheered him on. And then, all of a sudden, they wanted to see him punished for all that. They wanted 'justice'...

"The pathetic thing _ to me _ was how much they wanted HIS blood, after cheering him on for eight years."

In the days, and even weeks, after the finale aired June 10, "Sopranos" wonks combed that episode for buried clues, concocting wild theories. (Was this some sort of "Last Supper" reimagined with Tony, wife Carmela, son A.J. and daughter Meadow?)

Chase insists that what you saw (and didn't see) is what you get.

"There are no esoteric clues in there. No `Da Vinci Code,'" he declares.

He says it's "just great" if fans tried to find a deeper meaning, but "most of them, most of us, should have done this kind of thing in high school English class and didn't."

He defends the bleak, seemingly inconclusive ending as appropriate _ and even a little hopeful.

A.J. will "probably be a low-level movie producer. But he's not going to be a killer like his father, is he? Meadow may not become a pediatrician or even a lawyer ... but she'll learn to operate in the world in ways that Carmela never did.

"It's not ideal. It's not what the parents dreamed of. But it's better than it was," Chase says.

And as for that notorious blackout in the middle of the Journey power ballad, "Don't Stop Believin'"?

"Originally, I didn't want any credits at all," says Chase. "I just wanted the black screen to go the length of the credits _ all the way to the HBO `whoosh' sound. But the Directors Guild wouldn't give us a waiver."

And while this unexpected finish left lots of viewers thinking their cable service was on the fritz, Chase insists it wasn't meant as a prank.

"Why would we want to do that?" he asks. "Why would we entertain people for eight years only to give them the finger?"


On the Net:

1 comment: said...

Too busy changing allegiances from the Jets to the Pats to post?